Не, такими вещами не шутят =)
http://www.bolterandchainsword.com/index.p...p;#entry2890392
АДБ:
Because altering one's appearance for cosmetic purposes is usually seen - at the most basic level - as effeminate, pointless, or a compensation for some flaw. A lot of people complain that it's "weak" or "uncharacterful" for a primarch to care about (or even notice) such things. Yet more examples of why the 40K fandom (thankfully, with no examples in this thread) can come across as relatively immature. Some readers will complain and mock any emotion shown, or any sensitivity, or any behaviour less than stereotypically "manly". Usually younger readers, admittedly.
This came up in a Heresy meeting once, actually. Even we didn't agree on it. Me, Dan and Graham said it was cooler if Sanguinius had black hair, for various reasons. Jim preferred Sanguinius with blond hair. Ultimately, I think Jim's preference won out, as he'd reserved the Blood Angels at Signus Prime novel, and the older art showed the primarch as blond, too.
"Задоминировал же"Не верить они мне тут будут :rolleyes:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4151/498917...d7c2d6b63_o.jpg
http://www.blacklibrary.com/Images/BL/blog...-minimeet-2.jpg